The for iter loop does nothing more than grab 10 samples fast as possible, the accuracy seems to be limited to about 1e-5 before the numbers go from orderly to jumping, its a consistent jump like 1,3,5,7,9 though at the 1e-6 level if you need to do something in your loops that do something on 0.000002s after doing something at 0.000000s you'll miss the compare. I also realize pythons limitations now if your performance loop really needs to be performance. clock() returns floats and not a huge long representing a counting register of MCU clock ticks since power-on. The post on Stack exchange leads one to believe that if your loops need to be super tight (greater than 1e-6 accurate), then those loops should be implemented in C as an add-on module (with python API wrapper I think). Just found a post on stack exchange that explained why the samples were not 1e-6 alligned (overhead with python) and why the results were more like 1e-3 and 1e-5 accurate. I had a thought of doing it that way just now.
#HOW TO RUN SYNPLIFY PRO 2017.9 IN UBUNTU SOFTWARE#
The software also supports FPGA architectures from a variety of FPGA vendors, including Achronix. Synplify software supports the latest VHDL and Verilog language constructs including SystemVerilog and VHDL-2008. Thank you Paeryn for the very clear answer. Synplify FPGA synthesis software is the industry standard for producing high-performance and cost-effective FPGA designs.
#HOW TO RUN SYNPLIFY PRO 2017.9 IN UBUNTU CODE#
I will try to "&"-off the larger significant number and just multiply the fractal part by 1e06 and change it to an int as the fractal part which seems fairly accurate to 1e-06 when using time.time()Įdit: Title and some code and output display for clarity. So, how would I be able to convert these floats to usable int values like a long or double representing uS or nS "ticks"? Similarly, the time.clock() prints out as a float (0.700483) Joined: Sun 9:08 pm Tue 3:21 am New to python (from Parallax's STAMP's & Propeller, and recently Arduino and C++) I'm not a pro coder, this is not my profession, just my passion and hobby. I noticed a difference with calling 'perf_counter' vs 'clock' in that the reported resolution from 'perf_counter' is 1e-09 and the resolution from 'clock' is 1e-06.Īnd while running this quick, tight iter: When I query ipython3 with : time.get_clock_info('perf_counter'), it returns with the namespace object printed out. New to python (from Parallax's STAMP's & Propeller, and recently Arduino and C++) I'm not a pro coder, this is not my profession, just my passion and hobby.Īccording to Python 3.3+ documentation the time.get_clock_info(name) returns a namespace object.
0 kommentar(er)
